With the comment period 9n the fcc's new rules proposal for 60 m the
arrl has responded with a call to amateurs to comment on the proposal
with specific emphasis on the use of the band for public service and the
experiences of individual hanlms in that context.
This response from the league goes directly to what I have been saying
all along about the league using emergency communications as the wedge
to drive governmental policy as regards ham radio. Not only operating
privileges but a whole host of issues such as regulations on antennas
global installations and so on.
Like it or not, Newington obviously feels that emergency communication
is the best argument they have for defending any and all of amateur
radio operation.
Iirc, one of the purposes of granting amateurs access to the 60-m band
was the desire for interoperability between amateur stations and the
United States military. I can't think of anything, personally, that
would negatively affect that interoperability than lowering licensed
power levels to the relative equipment of citizens Bank. Indeed in
looking over this new proposal from the commission I can't imagine what
got into their heads, and what the purpose of this new rulemaking is.
Perhaps some of you have some insight on that point.
All of that said, I will repeat what I said a couple of months ago: The
constant drumbeat from some amateurs that amateur radio is not an
emergency service may technically be correct but in my view of the
league in their efforts to protect what operating privileges we have.
Now, anyone who's read any of my stuff goes that I'm no fan of the
league, but in this at least they are correct. If there is in fact a
stronger argument to be placed before the FCC then the standard SHTF
scenario, I've yet to hear it.
Saturday, November 04, 2023
EmCon rears it's head again
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment