With the comment period 9n the fcc's new rules proposal for 60 m the 
arrl has responded with a call to amateurs to comment on the proposal 
with specific emphasis on the use of the band for public service and the
 experiences of individual hanlms in that context.
This response from the league goes directly to what I have been saying 
all along about the league using emergency communications as the wedge 
to drive governmental policy as regards ham radio. Not only operating 
privileges but a whole host of issues such as regulations on antennas 
global installations and so on.
Like it or not, Newington obviously feels that emergency communication 
is the best argument they have for defending any and all of amateur 
radio operation.
Iirc, one of the purposes of granting amateurs access to the 60-m band 
was the desire for interoperability between amateur stations and the 
United States military. I can't think of anything, personally, that 
would negatively affect that interoperability than lowering licensed 
power levels to the relative equipment of citizens Bank. Indeed in 
looking over this new proposal from the commission I can't imagine what 
got into their heads, and what the purpose of this new rulemaking is. 
Perhaps some of you have some insight on that point.
All of that said, I will repeat what I said a couple of months ago: The 
constant drumbeat from some amateurs that amateur radio is not an 
emergency service may technically be correct but in my view of the 
league in their efforts to protect what operating privileges we have.
Now, anyone who's read any of my stuff goes that I'm no fan of the 
league, but in this at least they are correct. If there is in fact a 
stronger argument to be placed before the FCC then the standard SHTF 
scenario, I've yet to hear it.
					
Saturday, November 04, 2023
EmCon rears it's head again
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment